-BO- wrote:
To the average person, Newton is a valid guess. To one with just decent sports knowledge, Cam is laughable. And I don't mean that in a bad way, everybody has various areas of expertise. Just pointing out that there's an invisible general sports knowledge line in there where Cam goes from very plausible to laughable without having a clue as to the actual answer.
BO
Yet, like movies and TV, the same problem applies to sports questions here. There is that same "invisible line" in my areas of expertise too, but there BT sees fit to throw in normally two or even three but always always at least one distractor(s) that is laughable for
everyone. A question about 3rd line hockey centers from the 50s will have five hockey players listed; one about early Motown songwriters will list all 5 options who are at least songwriters. A question about Viennese composers or Greek poets, even on Brainbuster, will include people like Napoleon, William Shakespeare, and, frequently and with decreasing humor, Tiefly or Botfly, leaving the person behind that invisible line a 50-50 guess on getting it right, not a 20% SITD. Sure for the cognoscenti 2 of the hockey players may have been right-wings and one may have died in 1947, and two of the songwriters may have been on other labels or only active in the late Motown era, but it doesn't take a specialist's knowledge to know that Tiefly is not a Greek poet. If all a tone-deaf rap fan has to do to get full bonus on an arts question asking for the composer of the Italian opera L'Inganno Felice is pick the ONE option listed with a vaguely Italian name (an incredibly frequent way to turn a toughie into a gimme for arts questions) rather than choose between Bellini, Rossini, Cherubini and Donizetti, why do the non-gogglewatchers have to memorize the third-string cast lists of every 1950s sitcom to choose between 5 B-list sitcom actors from that era the one who was Mr. Beasley on Blondie?
It seems like the question writers are keenly aware of that invisible line on PC and games, but either ignorant or dismissive of the fact it exists in more academic subjects. It's not just the arts - how many times do Tiefly and other joke distractors show up as scientists or historical figures. Now how many times do they show up as 1970s bands or 50s movie stars?