zog741 wrote:
I remember taking those when I was a kid; I particularly remember them in third or fourth grade before leaving Connecticut for New York and later Ohio.
Honestly, "real stuff that you should know" is different in the 2010s than it was in the 1950s and '60s. I would be more concerned about our country's educational system if we still took the same standardized test that we did a half century ago. The link you provided indicates that today's educators are trying to stay with the times.
-- RWM
ZOG, I'm gonna disagree with you a little bit. With the exceptions of advances in science, new events in what are now history, countries that have changed their names, new literature, and perhaps a few things I've overlooked, the basic things that the Iowa Tests tested us on have as much meaning and importance today as they did back in the 1950's.
I really liked the analogy questions like:
Sock is to foot as
A- Shirt is to tie
B- Pants are to belt
C- Boot is to shoe
D- Finger is to toe
E- Glove is to handYep, that was an easy one, but I'll bet you that it wouldn't be too hard to find some kids in the third grade these days, who would get it wrong.
You may think that I'm full of old fuddy duddy baloney, but it's my opinion that changes in standard testing are designed to cover up kids lack of basic knowledge, or the ability to reason from that knowledge, so our education system isn't exposed for failing to teach kids the basics that they need to know.
I was about to hang it up, until I noticed your post, which I thought deserved a reply. Now that I've done it, yep you guessed it:
....................................................
................................................................. Goodnight I'm going to bed.